Clinical Trials

Georgia Tech University Laboratory Atlanta, GA 30332

Laboratory Test to identify the efficacy of the EMF PROTECT in regards to

EMF radiation reduction, Negative Ion Output and Cell Phone Reception

Date of Testing: 5/12/2014 by Lab Technician: Samantha Thomas Lab Supervisor: Daniel McGraggen

Independent Laboratory EMF Emissions Test

Abstract: The purpose of today’s laboratory experiment was to test the EMF or electromagnetic frequency emissions of an Apple IPhone5 smartphone with and without the EMF Protect insert to measure it’s efficacy in removing radiation. In addition, we tested the negative ion output of the insert and the ionic environment at face level. Finally, we tested the signal strength during a call to measure the insert’s effect on signal strength.

Equipment Used:

• Com Systems, INC 3010 PRO Negative Ion Meter

• Cell Sensor, Cellular EMF Detection Meter

Testing Facility: Laboratory Controlled Environment

Testing Standards: The testing standards for this laboratory test were as follows. Fusion provided the testing equipment and testing instructions. The laboratory technicians then independently conducted the tests. The laboratory is not making any inference, suggestion or endorsement of the efficacy of the EMF Protect insert, or the proposed product claims. This is not a function of the laboratory. The laboratory simply conducts scientific tests under lab-controlled standards and reports the results.

Negative Ion Output: The negative ion output of the EMF Protect cell insert was tested.

Recorded Negative Ion Output: 10,490

Results Summary: EMF Protect was tested to emit 10,490 negative ions per CC, per second.

EMF Emissions Testing: We tested the EMF Emission from the cell phone in a variety of scenarios. We recorded in milligauss, which is the standard of measure commonly used in tested electromagnetic fields & radiation output. We tested approximately .25 of an inch from the face, this is the estimated face placement during a phone conversation.

Baseline Environmental Test: 9.8

Cell Phone Turned on at Rest: 72.6

Cell Phone Turned on at Rest w/ Insert: 12.1

Cell Phone Turned on and Connected: 87 (Maxed Out)

Cell Phone Turned on and Connected w/ Insert: 13.4

Summary: When the cell phone was at rest the EMF Protect reduced the radiation output by 97.64%. When the phone was actively making a phone call the EMF Protect reduced the radiation output by96.54%. However, this may be skewed because the meter maxed out at 87 and we cannot confirm the highest peak.

Ionic Environment Test: We tested the ionic environment roughly .25 inches above the cell phone. This would be the estimated face position.

Base ionic reading: 15 Negative Ions

Cell Phone turned on: 0 (We can’t calculate positive ions)

Cell Phone turned on at rest with Insert: 764 negative ions

Cell Phone turned on and connected with Insert: 568 negative ions

Summary: The cell phone at rest and connected, without the insert did not show any negative ion activity. The addition of the insert created a negative ion environment in the hundreds per second at projected face level.

Cell Phone Signal Test

We tested the Cell Phone for signal strength with and without the insert. For this test we are using the dBm measurement, which is the signal power ratio in decibels. Signal strength during call: -82 Signal strength during call with insert: -82

Summary: Cell phone signal strength did not change when the protect insert was applied.

Contact

Give us a call
Office location
Send us an email

Questions?

Give us a call or email below